H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 2-2
Elena-Gabriela Ruse and Magdalena Frech are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Frech leads 2–0 on clay, while Elena-Gabriela Ruse leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2026 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 2-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(5) 2-1 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-4 6-4 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2020* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |