H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 4-0
Elena Rybakina holds a 4–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Rybakina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Rybakina won the 2025 Ningbo quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | Ningbo | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-2 6-0 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | (w/o) | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Elena Rybakina | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| May 1, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elena Rybakina | 6-4 6-0 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |