H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Bianca Andreescu H2H: 3-1
Elena Rybakina holds a 3–1 lead over Bianca Andreescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Elena Rybakina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bianca Andreescu won the 2025 Rome third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Bianca Andreescu | 6-2 6-4 | Elena Rybakina | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elena Rybakina | 6-3 6-2 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2023* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-3 6-4 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Elena Rybakina | 6-4 7-6(5) | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Bianca Andreescu | #173 | #4 | 5,331 | 2,042 | 107 | 75 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Bianca Andreescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–8 | 81.4% | #5 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #46 | 1,855 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,904 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #95 | 1,780 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #132 | 1,776 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | 2025 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #228 | 1,727 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,712 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |