H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 2-2
Elena Rybakina and Yulia Putintseva are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Rybakina won the 2026 Miami second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-3 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| May 3, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Elena Rybakina | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-2 7-6(5) | Elena Rybakina | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | Elena Rybakina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |