H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Marta Kostyuk H2H: 1-2
Marta Kostyuk holds a 2–1 lead over Elina Svitolina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marta Kostyuk leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marta Kostyuk won the 2026 Roland Garros quarterfinal 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 24
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Marta Kostyuk | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Elina Svitolina | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2024* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marta Kostyuk | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Elina Svitolina | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 6-2 6-2 | Marta Kostyuk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Marta Kostyuk | #11 | #11 | 3,926 | 2,110 | 150 | 113 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Marta Kostyuk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #119 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #50 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2025 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #26 | 1,892 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2026 | 27–6 | 81.8% | #11 | 2,090 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |