H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova H2H: 1-3
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 3–1 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2026 Doha second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2026 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-2 6-1 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2024* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-3 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2017* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 |