H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 0-2
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2019 Roland Garros third round 6-7(7) 6-4 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-7(7) 6-4 11-9 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2017* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Anastasija Sevastova | 7-6(2) 5-7 6-1 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |