H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Anna Kalinskaya H2H: 0-3
Anna Kalinskaya holds a 3–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Kalinskaya leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2025 Montreal second round 1-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2025 | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| May 12, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2022* | Guadalajara 2 | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 0-6 7-5 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |