H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Camila Osorio H2H: 4-0
Elise Mertens holds a 4–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2025 Madrid second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-3 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Jan 31, 2025 | Singapore | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-2 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-3 7-6(3) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elise Mertens | 1-6 6-2 4-2 (ret.) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |