H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Caty Mcnally H2H: 2-1
Elise Mertens holds a 2–1 lead over Caty Mcnally in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Caty Mcnally leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caty Mcnally won the 2022 Birmingham third round 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Caty Mcnally | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 7-5 6-1 | Caty Mcnally | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 7-5 6-0 | Caty Mcnally | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Caty Mcnally | #57 | #50 | 1,136 | 1,834 | 59 | 69 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Caty Mcnally | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #142 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #148 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #540 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #85 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #57 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |