H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 2-1
Elise Mertens holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2025 Dubai second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2025 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-2 6-2 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-3 6-4 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-1 6-3 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |