H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Margarita Gasparyan H2H: 2-0
Elise Mertens holds a 2–0 lead over Margarita Gasparyan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2020 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-2 6-3 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-1 7-5 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |