H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-1
Elise Mertens and Ons Jabeur are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 1–0 on grass, while Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2022 Wimbledon fourth round 7-6(9) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Ons Jabeur | 7-6(9) 6-4 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-3 7-5 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |