Elise Mertens
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Elise Mertens holds a 2–0 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2020 US Open second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 6-3 7-5 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data | Sep 3, 2020* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Elise Mertens | 6-0 6-2 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data | Oct 18, 2017* | R32 | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #20 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,000 | 320 | 205 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #203 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,852 | 143 | 147 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #35 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #36 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #61 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,789 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #106 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #203 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #20 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2017 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2018 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2019 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2020 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 23 | 9 | 32 | 71.9% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 27 | 12 | 39 | 69.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2021 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2022 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2023 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2024 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 206 | 128 | 334 | 61.7% | 74 | 44 | 118 | 62.7% | 40 | 33 | 73 | 54.8% | — | 75 | 74 | 149 | 50.3% | 57 | 57 | 114 | 50.0% | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/526 of Elise Mertens's and 275/287 of Sara Sorribes Tormo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 4.6 | 62.8% | 66.9% | 45.1% | 22.9% | 39.1% | 58.0% | 41.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15/16 | 0.8 | 7.5 | 58.2% | 56.0% | 38.9% | 41.3% | 57.3% | 49.1% | 45.5% |
| 20 | 2016 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 55.3% | 61.0% | 47.1% | 44.4% | 67.4% | 54.9% | 48.4% | 2017 | 33/33 | 0.1 | 8.4 | 62.5% | 56.7% | 33.4% | 44.9% | 54.0% | 47.7% | 45.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 49/51 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 61.8% | 62.7% | 44.6% | 52.5% | 52.3% | 55.8% | 46.7% | 2018 | 20/20 | 0.1 | 7.3 | 61.9% | 50.9% | 32.5% | 45.9% | 46.0% | 43.9% | 42.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 60/64 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.0% | 66.0% | 46.8% | 53.5% | 47.2% | 58.6% | 47.0% | 2019 | 30/30 | 0.5 | 5.1 | 66.1% | 55.8% | 38.3% | 42.1% | 46.9% | 49.9% | 45.7% |
| 23 | 2019 | 57/60 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 61.2% | 67.3% | 48.5% | 56.8% | 46.6% | 59.8% | 46.2% | 2020 | 19/19 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 70.3% | 54.8% | 39.6% | 47.8% | 54.1% | 50.2% | 46.9% |
| 24 | 2020 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 61.0% | 70.2% | 48.1% | 62.3% | 52.8% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 2021 | 43/52 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 67.9% | 58.4% | 44.2% | 48.3% | 55.5% | 53.6% | 48.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 50/52 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 58.5% | 68.3% | 43.7% | 49.4% | 51.2% | 57.9% | 46.8% | 2022 | 40/40 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 71.2% | 58.2% | 46.3% | 51.3% | 47.3% | 55.0% | 48.5% |
| 26 | 2022 | 47/49 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 57.9% | 69.3% | 44.9% | 46.9% | 52.3% | 58.8% | 46.7% | 2023 | 27/28 | 0.7 | 4.8 | 68.8% | 60.1% | 41.8% | 54.3% | 65.5% | 54.3% | 52.8% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/47 | 3.8 | 6.6 | 54.0% | 68.2% | 43.7% | 49.7% | 48.3% | 57.0% | 46.4% | 2024 | 36/37 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 72.2% | 51.2% | 42.4% | 43.0% | 52.5% | 48.9% | 46.1% |
| 28 | 2024 | 52/52 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 54.9% | 67.7% | 47.2% | 49.2% | 43.5% | 58.6% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 42/57 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 55.7% | 70.9% | 46.7% | 61.7% | 45.9% | 60.1% | 44.3% | 2026 | 7/7 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 68.9% | 54.9% | 39.9% | 37.6% | 54.8% | 51.0% | 49.6% |
| 30 | 2026 | 40/43 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 59.7% | 71.5% | 43.3% | 59.2% | 45.6% | 60.2% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 495/526 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 58.6% | 67.9% | 45.9% | 53.8% | 48.7% | 58.8% | 46.0% | — | 275/291 | 0.4 | 4.7 | 67.3% | 56.3% | 40.5% | 46.2% | 52.8% | 51.0% | 47.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1509 | 107.6 | +0.23 | -1.52 | 0.995 | 48.8% | — | +42 | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1549 | 108.9 | -4.48 | +1.18 | 0.894 | 47.3% | -50 | +79 | — | 41.2% | -0.79 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.29 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1546 | 114.6 | +0.31 | +2.24 | 1.071 | 51.6% | — | — | +187 | 53.3% | +0.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.48 | 2017 | 1593 | 111.7 | -6.49 | +0.81 | 0.860 | 46.5% | -37 | +78 | — | 45.9% | -0.61 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.9 | -0.46 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1734 | 133.6 | +0.24 | +2.71 | 1.057 | 51.3% | -42 | -32 | -72 | 54.4% | +0.38 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–8 (43%) | 104.5 | -1.32 | 2018 | 1590 | 107.9 | -8.26 | -1.27 | 0.748 | 43.0% | -45 | +100 | — | 35.7% | -1.52 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.41 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1820 | 149.2 | +2.19 | +3.65 | 1.136 | 52.8% | -27 | +78 | -134 | 64.7% | +1.14 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | 102.7 | +1.85 | 2019 | 1637 | 117.1 | -5.23 | +1.40 | 0.911 | 47.8% | -61 | +100 | -26 | 40.0% | -0.55 | 7–4 (64%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.9 | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1841 | 151.4 | +3.21 | +3.08 | 1.150 | 52.7% | +18 | -36 | -88 | 58.2% | +0.82 | 9–12 (43%) | 6–9 (40%) | 95.6 | -0.24 | 2020 | 1677 | 134.0 | -3.76 | +2.81 | 0.941 | 48.7% | -36 | +39 | — | 41.9% | -0.63 | 1–6 (14%) | 1–0 | — | -0.72 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1934 | 157.8 | +3.90 | +3.73 | 1.228 | 54.2% | +19 | -60 | — | 67.6% | +1.38 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.9 | -0.09 | 2021 | 1774 | 143.0 | -2.15 | +3.93 | 1.033 | 50.8% | +25 | -108 | -103 | 58.9% | +0.61 | 12–6 (67%) | 4–5 (44%) | 105.5 | +0.91 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1845 | 151.6 | +1.62 | +4.16 | 1.112 | 52.2% | +60 | +64 | -104 | 60.3% | +0.89 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 101.2 | -0.07 | 2022 | 1733 | 133.5 | -1.24 | +4.09 | 1.077 | 51.7% | -15 | +48 | -90 | 53.8% | +0.48 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.4 | +0.94 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1789 | 144.1 | +1.46 | +3.03 | 1.134 | 52.5% | +31 | +82 | -28 | 55.7% | +0.70 | 7–9 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | 94.2 | +1.98 | 2023 | 1778 | 137.7 | -0.72 | +7.08 | 1.155 | 53.4% | -6 | -13 | — | 63.2% | +1.14 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.6 | -1.23 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1819 | 147.2 | +0.37 | +2.82 | 1.081 | 51.6% | +29 | +20 | -94 | 56.6% | +0.57 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -0.17 | 2024 | 1705 | 126.8 | -5.87 | +2.16 | 0.903 | 47.6% | +8 | +35 | -127 | 47.7% | -0.49 | 7–7 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.2 | -0.63 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1789 | 149.2 | +1.83 | +1.03 | 1.051 | 50.7% | +1 | +82 | -81 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 8–9 (47%) | 1–5 (17%) | 96.0 | -1.04 | 2025 | 1616 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1867 | 155.8 | +3.19 | +1.74 | 1.111 | 52.0% | -32 | +16 | +59 | 63.3% | +0.97 | 7–10 (41%) | 10–7 (59%) | 98.4 | -1.14 | 2026 | 1629 | 114.1 | -2.38 | +1.92 | 1.011 | 50.2% | — | +84 | — | 37.5% | -0.62 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | -0.10 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1899 | 147.1 | +2.55 | +2.24 | 1.122 | 52.2% | -41 | -27 | +78 | 59.2% | +0.78 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.1 | +1.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2000 | 153.9 | +2.02 | +2.84 | 1.116 | 52.2% | +3 | +18 | -22 | 59.4% | +0.80 | 82–79 (51%) | 58–57 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.19 | — | 1853 | 129.8 | -3.87 | +2.62 | 0.957 | 49.0% | -12 | +46 | -86 | 48.7% | -0.16 | 47–40 (54%) | 24–25 (49%) | 101.5 | -0.40 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 10, 2024 | H2H |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 27, 2021 | H2H |
| Anna Blinkova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 4, 2025 | H2H |