H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:18 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Sorana Cirstea H2H: 0-3
Sorana Cirstea holds a 3–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sorana Cirstea leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2026 Miami third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 6-3 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2021* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Sorana Cirstea | 6-1 7-6(3) | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2018* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 7-5 6-4 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Sorana Cirstea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |