H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Xinyu Wang H2H: 2-1
Elise Mertens holds a 2–1 lead over Xinyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2025 Singapore semifinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 24
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2025 | Singapore | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-3 6-4 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2024* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-1 6-4 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Xinyu Wang | 6-3 6-1 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Xinyu Wang | #40 | #30 | 1,581 | 1,857 | 105 | 121 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Xinyu Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #86 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #40 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |