H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 22:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Yafan Wang H2H: 0-1
Yafan Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2017 Guangzhou third round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2017* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-2 7-6(5) | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elise Mertens | Yafan Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |