H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Elise Mertens H2H: 2-1
Emma Navarro holds a 2–1 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emma Navarro leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2026 Dubai third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2026 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-2 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2024* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-1 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2024* | Hobart | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Elise Mertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 |