H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Garbiñe Muguruza vs Serena Williams H2H: 3-3

Garbiñe Muguruza and Serena Williams are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Garbiñe Muguruza leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2019 Indian Wells third round 6-3 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Garbiñe Muguruza
ESP Age 32 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2019* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Garbiñe Muguruza #20 6-3 1-0 (ret.) Serena Williams #10 Match data
Jun 5, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Garbiñe Muguruza #4 7-5 6-4 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Jul 12, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam F Grass Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-4 Garbiñe Muguruza #20 Match data
Jan 27, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 2-6 6-3 6-2 Garbiñe Muguruza #24 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Garbiñe Muguruza #35 6-2 6-2 Serena Williams #1 Match data
Jan 18, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #3 6-2 6-0 Garbiñe Muguruza #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Garbiñe Muguruza #1,129 #1 6,766 2,067 306 178 63.2% 2 3 1 3 1 10
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Garbiñe Muguruza Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2012 6–8 42.9% #109 1,543 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2013 14–12 53.8% #63 1,669 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2014 38–22 63.3% #20 1,809 0 1 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2015 39–19 67.2% #3 1,950 0 2 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2016 28–19 59.6% #7 1,837 1 3 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2017 46–19 70.8% #2 1,932 2 5 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2018 36–20 64.3% #18 1,841 2 6 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2019 22–14 61.1% #36 1,814 2 7 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2020 23–8 74.2% #15 1,933 2 7 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2021 42–16 72.4% #3 2,023 2 10 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2022 12–17 41.4% #55 1,783 2 10 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2023 0–4 0.0% #1081 1,729 2 10 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 — — — — — — — 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 — — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71