H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 1-2
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 2–1 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2009 Palermo third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2009* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-1 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| May 28, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 7-6(5) 0-6 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gisela Dulko | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |