H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Mara Santangelo H2H: 1-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Mara Santangelo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2009 Strasbourg third round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2009* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 6-1 7-6(3) | Mara Santangelo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,824 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Mara Santangelo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #134 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |