H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Tiantian Sun H2H: 3-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 3–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gisela Dulko leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2007 Los Angeles second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2007* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 7-5 6-4 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2007* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-4 6-1 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 6-2 6-2 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,650 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gisela Dulko | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |