H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Jana Fett vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 1-0
Jana Fett holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Fett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Fett won the 2017 Japan Women's Open Tennis fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 29
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2018 | Hobart | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 4-6 6-0 6-4 | Jana Fett | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2017* | Japan Women's Open Tennis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jana Fett | 6-0 6-3 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Fett | #415 | #97 | 685 | 1,678 | 25 | 39 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Fett | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #103 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #208 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #189 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |