H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Fett vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 1-0
Jana Fett holds a 1–0 lead over Sachia Vickery in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Fett leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jana Fett won the 2018 Rabat third round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 29
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2018* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jana Fett | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2017 | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | Q3 | Hard | Jana Fett | 7-6(6) 6-1 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2017 | Linz | WTA 500 | Q3 | Clay | Jana Fett | 6-1 6-1 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2017 | Nottingham | WTA 250 | Q2 | Grass | Jana Fett | 6-4 6-3 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Fett | #415 | #97 | 685 | 1,678 | 25 | 39 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Fett | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #103 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #208 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #189 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |