H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jana Fett vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 1-0
Jana Fett holds a 1–0 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Fett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Fett won the 2020 Linz third round 6-2 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 29
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2020* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jana Fett | 6-2 3-1 (ret.) | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2019 | Moscow | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 6-2 6-2 | Jana Fett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Fett | #415 | #97 | 685 | 1,678 | 25 | 39 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Fett | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #103 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #208 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #189 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |