H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Jil Teichmann holds a 1–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2022 Italian Open first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | 6-3 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | May 11, 2022* | R64 | Italian Open | WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #35 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 179 | 142 | 55.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Jil Teichmann | #168 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 95 | 104 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,610 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #168 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,004 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #35 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2026 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 107 | 85 | 192 | 55.7% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 51 | 61 | 112 | 45.5% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 300/322 of Jasmine Paolini's and 185/200 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | 2026 | 9/10 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 68.0% | 59.2% | 49.7% | 56.2% | 51.8% | 56.2% | 46.6% |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 34/36 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 67.2% | 59.5% | 47.6% | 57.3% | 47.1% | 55.4% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 300/322 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 67.1% | 59.9% | 47.3% | 53.3% | 48.7% | 55.8% | 44.3% | — | 185/200 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 61.0% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.9% | 46.9% | 56.6% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -96 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +84 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.3 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +74 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | 2025 | 1648 | 117.5 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +31 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.27 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -12 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | 2026 | 1718 | 124.8 | -0.12 | +1.84 | 1.064 | 51.5% | — | +47 | — | 73.7% | +1.16 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.35 |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.5 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -156 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1874 | 142.8 | -0.89 | +1.09 | 0.994 | 50.0% | +7 | +103 | +37 | 50.0% | +0.06 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–7 (22%) | 97.0 | +1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2057 | 145.3 | -0.18 | +1.44 | 1.002 | 50.2% | -26 | +29 | -123 | 52.3% | +0.09 | 65–41 (61%) | 34–30 (53%) | 111.0 | +0.27 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.28 | +0.25 | 0.988 | 49.7% | +5 | +89 | -158 | 49.4% | -0.10 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.59 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Simona Waltert | 3 | 0 | 3 | Oct 27, 2026 | H2H |