H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2021 Linz fourth round 6-1 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2021* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2019* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jasmine Paolini | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |