H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Sofia Kenin H2H: 1-3
Sofia Kenin holds a 3–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sofia Kenin leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Beijing third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 27
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-0 | Sofia Kenin | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2025 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Sofia Kenin | 6-4 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2019* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sofia Kenin | 7-5 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| May 15, 2019* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sofia Kenin | 6-1 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Sofia Kenin | #106 | #4 | 5,915 | 1,977 | 172 | 150 | 53.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Sofia Kenin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #14 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #4 | 1,953 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #12 | 1,836 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #228 | 1,666 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,791 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,735 | 1 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #28 | 1,788 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,665 | 1 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |