H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-0
Jelena Ostapenko holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2016 Doha quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-4 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Ostapenko | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |