H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jelena Ostapenko vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-2

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2021 Indian Wells Open second round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Ostapenko
Latvia Age 29 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Ostapenko #29 6-3 6-0 Su-Wei Hsieh #96 Match data Oct 9, 2021* R64 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Su-Wei Hsieh #29 6-2 6-2 Jelena Ostapenko #37 Match data Jul 3, 2019* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Su-Wei Hsieh #90 3-6 7-5 6-1 Jelena Ostapenko #81 Match data Jan 20, 2016* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Ostapenko #32 #5 5,611 2,022 293 219 57.2% 1 0 0 5 3 9
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
17 2014 1–1 50.0% #271 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2015 6–5 54.5% #84 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2016 20–24 45.5% #44 1,587 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2017 43–20 68.3% #7 1,904 1 2 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2018 23–21 52.3% #22 1,764 1 2 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2019 25–26 49.0% #45 1,796 1 3 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2020 8–7 53.3% #44 1,794 1 3 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2021 31–19 62.0% #28 1,885 1 4 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 2022 31–19 62.0% #18 1,842 1 5 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 2023 38–22 63.3% #13 1,904 1 6 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 2024 29–18 61.7% #15 1,821 1 8 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 2025 17–19 47.2% #23 1,768 1 9 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 2026 21–18 53.8% #32 1,806 1 9 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2017 22 14 36 61.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2020 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2023 23 16 39 59.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2024 18 10 28 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2025 8 14 22 36.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2026 9 11 20 45.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 174 147 321 54.2% 63 47 110 57.3% 56 25 81 69.1% — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 477/514 of Jelena Ostapenko's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2014 2/2 2.5 7.5 50.3% 64.2% 40.8% 59.2% 46.9% 52.5% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 4/11 2.3 8.8 51.3% 68.6% 37.4% 46.0% 55.6% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 41/44 3.2 6.0 55.9% 63.9% 44.3% 46.5% 47.3% 55.3% 47.0% 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2017 57/63 3.0 6.0 52.4% 66.3% 44.4% 52.2% 49.7% 55.7% 47.9% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 2018 41/44 3.2 6.0 53.7% 62.2% 43.2% 44.4% 53.4% 53.9% 45.0% 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2019 50/51 2.6 8.5 54.2% 65.5% 40.4% 49.4% 49.8% 53.8% 44.9% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2020 15/15 2.1 6.7 56.0% 63.0% 42.4% 52.5% 56.4% 54.3% 47.8% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2021 48/50 2.3 4.9 59.2% 65.5% 44.8% 47.2% 51.4% 57.3% 47.9% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 2022 50/50 3.3 4.5 58.7% 65.7% 46.0% 51.8% 50.2% 57.5% 45.7% 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 2023 59/60 3.9 4.8 57.7% 67.9% 44.8% 53.0% 51.2% 58.0% 45.4% 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 2024 46/47 4.2 5.5 58.2% 67.2% 44.3% 53.9% 47.3% 57.6% 44.9% 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 2025 26/38 3.8 6.3 56.3% 64.1% 42.6% 45.4% 52.0% 54.8% 44.0% 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 2026 38/39 3.6 5.9 57.5% 68.9% 39.9% 53.8% 55.6% 56.7% 44.6% 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career — 477/514 3.2 5.9 56.3% 65.8% 43.5% 50.2% 50.8% 56.1% 45.9% — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
17 2014 1506 102.9 -0.95 -1.08 0.989 49.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 1564 113.6 -0.38 -0.84 0.917 48.0% +1 — — 51.9% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 1587 129.6 -0.26 +3.66 1.052 51.1% -18 -56 +58 47.0% -0.01 5–9 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.1 +0.42 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
20 2017 1905 140.7 -0.06 +4.38 1.081 51.7% -121 -14 -156 61.0% +0.69 19–7 (73%) 8–7 (53%) 113.0 -0.70 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03
21 2018 1765 135.8 -1.97 +1.80 0.976 49.4% -46 +60 +98 52.5% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 11–3 (79%) 104.3 +1.89 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
22 2019 1797 138.3 -2.06 +2.13 0.973 49.4% -6 -63 +57 49.5% -0.12 10–7 (59%) 6–2 (75%) 105.6 +0.41 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39
23 2020 1795 129.8 -1.03 +3.31 1.046 51.1% -14 -42 — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 0–2 — -0.12 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39
24 2021 1886 145.5 +0.96 +4.80 1.122 52.4% -58 -102 +128 60.3% +0.78 10–10 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 -0.11 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03
25 2022 1842 151.3 +0.61 +3.32 1.076 51.7% +25 -134 +215 56.9% +0.71 12–8 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 +0.07 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
26 2023 1905 154.5 +1.65 +2.98 1.082 51.8% -12 -121 +196 58.2% +0.74 19–11 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 106.0 -0.43 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40
27 2024 1821 149.7 +0.73 +1.92 1.057 51.4% +46 -10 +294 58.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.64 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23
28 2025 1769 150.6 -1.17 +1.25 0.972 49.2% -34 +155 — 45.8% +0.11 7–4 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.73 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26
29 2026 1807 143.7 -0.48 +1.17 1.030 50.5% -68 +101 +265 54.9% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +2.03 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2022 149.7 -0.12 +2.85 1.045 51.0% -27 -7 +135 54.9% +0.40 107–78 (58%) 60–44 (58%) 108.9 +1.22 — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.