H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Elise Mertens H2H: 1-4
Elise Mertens holds a 4–1 lead over Jessica Pegula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2025 Rome third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 7-5 6-1 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-4 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-1 6-3 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2021* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Elise Mertens | 5-7 7-5 6-0 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2020* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-1 6-3 | Jessica Pegula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jessica Pegula | Elise Mertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |