H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Danielle Collins holds a 2–1 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Danielle Collins leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Danielle Collins won the 2023 Adelaide 2 second round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | 6-3 7-6(2) | Jil Teichmann | Match data | Jan 12, 2023* | R16 | Adelaide 2 | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Danielle Collins | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data | Aug 11, 2021* | R64 | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jil Teichmann | 6-3 6-3 | Danielle Collins | Match data | Aug 23, 2020* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Danielle Collins | #343 | #7 | 3,702 | 2,073 | 174 | 118 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #915 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #45 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,898 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #64 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2018 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2019 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | — | 111 | 79 | 190 | 58.4% | 52 | 28 | 80 | 65.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 279/293 of Danielle Collins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% | 2014 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 59.0% | 63.3% | 52.9% | 64.3% | 20.0% | 59.0% | 32.3% |
| 21 | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% | 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 26.9% | 42.9% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 34.0% | 36.6% |
| 23 | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 56.3% | 37.0% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 35.4% | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% | 2018 | 30/35 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 58.0% | 60.3% | 46.2% | 47.0% | 47.7% | 54.1% | 41.8% |
| 25 | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% | 2019 | 35/36 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 59.4% | 62.0% | 47.0% | 51.0% | 52.5% | 56.2% | 41.8% |
| 26 | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% | 2020 | 16/16 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 58.9% | 71.1% | 48.3% | 61.6% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 43.8% |
| 27 | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% | 2021 | 52/52 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 54.6% | 70.3% | 48.5% | 54.9% | 54.3% | 60.2% | 46.1% |
| 28 | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% | 2022 | 31/31 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 54.1% | 69.6% | 48.1% | 57.9% | 52.5% | 59.6% | 45.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36/36 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 59.0% | 67.2% | 47.2% | 55.1% | 48.1% | 58.8% | 42.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 50/54 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 56.5% | 71.1% | 47.4% | 58.9% | 52.9% | 60.8% | 45.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 26/30 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 49.5% | 55.1% | 51.5% | 58.8% | 41.9% |
| Career | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% | — | 279/293 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 57.0% | 67.2% | 47.7% | 54.9% | 51.3% | 58.7% | 43.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 | 2014 | 1498 | 107.7 | +4.54 | +2.42 | 0.787 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.24 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 | 2016 | 1492 | 98.2 | -2.62 | -4.63 | 0.555 | 35.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 | 2017 | 1484 | 100.8 | -2.48 | +1.44 | 0.619 | 37.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 | 2018 | 1659 | 126.6 | -1.48 | -1.03 | 0.910 | 48.1% | +14 | -93 | -38 | 46.8% | -0.30 | 9–4 (69%) | 2–2 (50%) | 106.1 | +0.97 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 | 2019 | 1717 | 138.4 | -0.18 | -0.13 | 0.953 | 49.3% | -18 | -87 | -80 | 51.3% | -0.12 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.1 | -1.21 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 | 2020 | 1813 | 147.3 | +3.14 | +1.35 | 1.131 | 52.7% | -60 | -109 | — | 60.0% | +0.85 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -1.27 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 | 2021 | 1891 | 152.7 | +3.13 | +2.70 | 1.158 | 53.3% | +4 | -43 | — | 71.3% | +1.40 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–3 (70%) | 107.5 | +0.72 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 | 2022 | 1898 | 149.2 | +2.47 | +2.92 | 1.117 | 52.3% | +79 | -119 | — | 66.2% | +0.81 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–3 (67%) | 99.8 | +0.10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1855 | 153.7 | +2.52 | +1.03 | 1.025 | 50.4% | +53 | — | — | 53.6% | +0.20 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–7 (42%) | 91.8 | -2.00 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1951 | 160.8 | +3.69 | +3.10 | 1.157 | 53.2% | -11 | +71 | -239 | 68.1% | +1.30 | 9–7 (56%) | 7–1 (88%) | 104.9 | -1.22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1860 | 143.1 | +1.81 | -0.05 | 1.019 | 50.4% | -7 | +142 | -159 | 50.7% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.4 | -0.97 |
| Career | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 | — | 2074 | 154.6 | +2.01 | +1.46 | 1.057 | 51.3% | +14 | -3 | -124 | 59.0% | +0.55 | 49–46 (52%) | 38–24 (61%) | 107.7 | -1.76 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jul 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 24, 2025 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 6, 2024 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 5 | 0 | 5 | May 12, 2024 | H2H |