H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-1
Jil Teichmann and Daria Saville are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on clay, while Daria Saville leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2022 Berlin third round 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Daria Saville | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2022* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Daria Saville | 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2019* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Daria Saville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |