H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jil Teichmann vs Eugenie Bouchard.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | 6-3 6-1 | Jil Teichmann | Match data | Oct 14, 2018 | Q2 | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,927 | 158 | 147 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #46 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 23 | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2018 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2019 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | — | 98 | 101 | 199 | 49.2% | 45 | 29 | 74 | 60.8% | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 64.1% | 64.4% | 38.1% | 59.9% | 56.7% | 54.8% | 34.9% |
| 18 | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% | 2012 | 9/9 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 58.4% | 66.2% | 47.0% | 58.4% | 39.6% | 58.4% | 43.0% |
| 19 | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% | 2013 | 34/42 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 56.8% | 64.2% | 47.1% | 51.2% | 44.0% | 56.7% | 46.5% |
| 20 | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% | 2014 | 57/62 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 60.4% | 66.0% | 47.6% | 54.0% | 50.3% | 58.5% | 46.5% |
| 21 | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% | 2015 | 25/29 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 60.1% | 62.4% | 47.7% | 49.2% | 48.0% | 56.8% | 41.5% |
| 22 | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% | 2016 | 50/54 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 60.4% | 63.6% | 48.8% | 50.2% | 45.9% | 57.8% | 44.7% |
| 23 | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% | 2017 | 28/31 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 58.3% | 58.7% | 45.0% | 49.3% | 48.3% | 53.0% | 42.7% |
| 24 | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% | 2018 | 24/24 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 59.2% | 63.1% | 44.0% | 57.2% | 46.4% | 55.5% | 44.2% |
| 25 | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% | 2019 | 14/14 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 60.7% | 60.7% | 42.3% | 50.0% | 54.0% | 53.3% | 42.9% |
| 26 | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% | 2020 | 14/14 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 65.5% | 65.3% | 49.8% | 61.5% | 49.6% | 59.8% | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% | 2021 | 7/7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.7% | 65.2% | 45.7% | 49.6% | 50.9% | 57.9% | 46.8% |
| 28 | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% | 2022 | 8/8 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 57.0% | 61.4% | 51.7% | 60.8% | 45.3% | 57.3% | 42.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6/6 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 66.8% | 62.6% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 51.9% | 59.0% | 43.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 62.0% | 59.5% | 47.9% | 54.2% | 37.4% | 55.1% | 41.8% |
| Career | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% | — | 282/306 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 60.0% | 63.5% | 47.1% | 52.6% | 47.7% | 56.9% | 44.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1493 | 102.7 | -1.04 | -2.27 | 0.773 | 45.8% | +18 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.78 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.10 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 | 2012 | 1546 | 114.3 | +1.12 | -0.43 | 1.033 | 50.7% | +7 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.38 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.18 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 | 2013 | 1752 | 141.5 | +1.07 | +2.65 | 1.074 | 51.5% | -37 | -74 | -156 | 58.2% | +0.47 | 7–9 (44%) | 8–1 (89%) | 106.1 | -1.18 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 | 2014 | 1863 | 150.8 | +2.70 | +3.29 | 1.122 | 52.4% | -96 | +19 | -107 | 61.4% | +0.82 | 10–8 (56%) | 7–5 (58%) | 104.2 | -1.19 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 | 2015 | 1702 | 123.0 | -1.20 | +0.51 | 0.961 | 49.3% | +34 | +67 | -27 | 50.0% | -0.02 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–5 (55%) | 94.8 | +1.50 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 | 2016 | 1697 | 133.5 | +1.68 | +1.09 | 1.060 | 51.1% | -16 | +85 | -6 | 54.6% | +0.26 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.4 | -1.41 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 | 2017 | 1602 | 127.4 | -1.89 | -0.77 | 0.909 | 47.9% | -17 | +221 | +25 | 40.3% | -0.82 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–3 (57%) | 93.2 | -0.95 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 | 2018 | 1670 | 127.3 | -0.75 | +1.08 | 0.994 | 49.8% | -14 | +151 | — | 42.2% | -0.31 | 2–1 (67%) | 5–0 (100%) | 106.6 | +0.16 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 | 2019 | 1617 | 127.0 | -1.49 | -0.31 | 0.919 | 47.9% | +26 | — | — | 38.2% | -0.62 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.76 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 | 2020 | 1713 | 127.8 | +1.82 | +1.44 | 1.130 | 52.7% | -64 | +114 | — | 65.7% | +1.00 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.7 | +0.41 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 | 2021 | 1704 | 112.6 | +0.44 | +0.05 | 1.114 | 52.1% | -53 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.40 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.45 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 | 2022 | 1633 | 117.1 | +0.22 | +0.59 | 0.998 | 50.2% | -38 | — | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.2 | +0.57 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1637 | 118.3 | +0.17 | -0.98 | 1.060 | 51.3% | — | +151 | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.7 | +1.03 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1618 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1611 | 113.9 | +1.04 | -0.76 | 0.931 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.17 | 1–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 | — | 1927 | 140.4 | +0.68 | +1.24 | 1.032 | 50.6% | -27 | +65 | -55 | 53.1% | +0.19 | 43–57 (43%) | 45–29 (61%) | 102.0 | -0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 19, 2018 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 28, 2017 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 20, 2019 | H2H |