H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Jennifer Brady H2H: 1-1
Jil Teichmann and Jennifer Brady are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Brady won the 2020 Lexington final 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2020* | Lexington | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 6-3 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Dec 20, 2019* | Limoges | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 7-5 7-6(12) | Jennifer Brady | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2019 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Jennifer Brady | 1-6 6-1 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jennifer Brady | #618 | #13 | 3,840 | 1,942 | 72 | 76 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Jennifer Brady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #115 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |