H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1

Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2020 ASB Classic second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jil Teichmann
Switzerland Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julia Goerges
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Goerges #41 6-3 6-2 Jil Teichmann #68 Match data Jan 10, 2020* R16 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jil Teichmann #175 #21 2,101 1,882 94 104 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,945 311 251 55.3% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,532 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,589 0 0
21 2019 12–10 54.5% #69 1,609 0 2 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,773 0 2
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,777 0 2 2012 36–26 58.1% #18 1,761 0 2
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,694 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,543 0 2
25 2023 9–18 33.3% #147 1,625 0 2 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,587 0 2
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,617 0 2 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,609 0 2
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,648 0 2 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,668 0 2
28 2026 6–2 75.0% #175 1,708 0 2 2017 46–22 67.6% #14 1,892 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2018 45–23 66.2% #14 1,871 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,802 0 7
31 — — — — — — — 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,763 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jil Teichmann Julia Goerges
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2019 0 7 7 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 14 30 53.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2021 20 13 33 60.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2022 8 14 22 36.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 7 16 23 30.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 10 10 20 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2025 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2026 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 35 13 48 72.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 28 14 42 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 19 12 31 61.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 50 61 111 45.0% 43 34 77 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% — — — — — 197 156 353 55.8% 86 73 159 54.1% 26 20 46 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 524/562 of Julia Goerges's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jil Teichmann Julia Goerges
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 3.5 6.5 44.3% 70.9% 50.5% 63.5% 54.2% 59.3% 41.6% 2007 6/9 2.7 3.3 54.7% 64.8% 42.0% 59.6% 55.1% 54.0% 40.7%
19 2017 4/4 2.0 5.0 53.5% 55.0% 40.6% 31.7% 45.4% 47.4% 34.9% 2008 11/13 5.1 5.3 59.1% 67.7% 46.8% 52.0% 47.2% 59.3% 39.2%
20 2018 9/9 3.1 2.9 62.4% 69.7% 44.8% 55.3% 38.8% 60.4% 39.6% 2009 19/20 5.2 2.4 60.4% 68.6% 50.1% 58.4% 43.6% 61.4% 40.4%
21 2019 22/22 1.9 1.6 63.6% 64.4% 50.3% 57.3% 52.8% 59.2% 45.0% 2010 49/51 4.2 3.5 61.2% 66.7% 45.8% 58.1% 48.1% 58.5% 43.3%
22 2020 20/21 2.7 2.9 62.6% 64.0% 49.0% 60.6% 49.2% 58.2% 45.6% 2011 59/60 4.1 2.7 58.4% 70.4% 49.1% 52.6% 48.8% 61.3% 43.2%
23 2021 40/43 2.2 3.5 59.1% 63.8% 48.7% 56.1% 45.2% 57.5% 43.2% 2012 56/62 3.9 2.9 57.7% 67.0% 48.1% 54.3% 47.8% 59.1% 43.6%
24 2022 40/40 2.3 3.7 60.3% 63.7% 45.7% 52.8% 49.0% 56.3% 42.6% 2013 40/41 4.5 4.0 55.6% 66.4% 44.5% 53.8% 46.9% 56.5% 40.0%
25 2023 27/27 2.4 3.5 59.7% 61.7% 43.4% 48.4% 44.7% 54.6% 41.2% 2014 31/33 6.1 4.1 59.2% 68.5% 48.8% 54.2% 44.2% 60.3% 42.5%
26 2024 4/5 0.5 2.8 64.1% 60.7% 40.1% 31.7% 51.0% 52.6% 50.8% 2015 30/37 4.7 2.5 60.0% 67.8% 47.7% 49.3% 50.2% 59.9% 40.7%
27 2025 8/17 1.3 3.0 63.6% 58.2% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 50.2% 35.5% 2016 36/42 5.0 3.4 56.9% 71.9% 49.2% 58.3% 41.9% 61.9% 40.6%
28 2026 8/8 0.6 3.4 67.7% 58.6% 50.2% 52.7% 47.9% 56.0% 45.9% 2017 64/68 5.8 3.4 57.0% 72.1% 49.1% 56.1% 50.6% 62.3% 42.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 65/68 7.4 3.7 57.7% 74.7% 49.3% 59.1% 42.7% 63.9% 39.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 6.7 4.1 55.4% 73.0% 48.9% 58.3% 42.8% 62.1% 40.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 12/12 6.6 3.5 56.8% 70.9% 47.8% 60.1% 48.8% 61.0% 40.5%
Career — 184/198 2.2 3.2 60.9% 63.2% 46.4% 52.8% 46.6% 56.5% 42.9% — 524/562 5.3 3.4 57.9% 70.0% 48.1% 55.9% 46.6% 60.7% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jil Teichmann Julia Goerges
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1524 100.0 +0.12 +0.08 1.022 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 2007 1544 122.1 +0.76 +0.36 0.884 47.2% +9 — — 40.0% -0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18
19 2017 1523 105.8 -2.24 -1.97 0.664 41.0% — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 — — -0.23 2008 1558 111.9 +1.60 -1.77 0.961 49.2% +4 — — 46.7% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.66
20 2018 1533 114.7 +2.45 -2.19 1.002 49.7% +16 — — 40.0% -0.15 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.57 2009 1590 119.7 +2.92 -2.21 1.046 50.8% -1 -63 +41 50.0% +0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 -0.08
21 2019 1610 121.1 +1.59 +1.12 1.104 52.0% -95 +168 — 53.1% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.11 2010 1761 134.3 +2.06 +0.13 1.043 51.0% -59 -53 — 54.7% +0.42 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 104.4 -1.65
22 2020 1672 133.5 +0.65 +1.84 1.092 51.6% -40 +83 — 51.1% +0.29 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.20 2011 1774 141.6 +5.63 -0.14 1.115 52.1% -57 +89 -162 55.6% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 4–11 (27%) 98.6 -1.13
23 2021 1777 147.8 +1.29 +1.02 1.017 50.5% +25 -71 — 54.4% +0.13 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.26 2012 1761 139.8 +2.73 +0.03 1.067 51.4% +21 +17 -68 55.1% +0.34 11–7 (61%) 9–12 (43%) 100.1 -0.26
24 2022 1694 140.7 -0.18 +0.52 0.976 49.5% -3 +179 -208 49.4% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 6–10 (38%) 95.6 -0.06 2013 1544 119.3 +0.51 -3.35 0.920 48.5% +41 +130 — 40.4% -0.70 5–10 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 89.5 +1.42
25 2023 1626 126.4 -0.88 -1.70 0.908 48.0% +59 +76 -120 40.9% -0.68 3–9 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 90.9 +0.06 2014 1588 128.4 +3.16 -0.41 1.070 51.1% +14 +50 — 51.2% +0.09 4–14 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 89.3 -1.01
26 2024 1617 107.3 -1.72 +1.68 1.072 51.5% -24 — — 55.6% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2015 1610 130.1 +1.79 -0.65 1.013 50.5% -4 +23 — 47.6% +0.12 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 98.9 -0.01
27 2025 1648 117.6 -2.75 -3.33 0.712 42.6% +30 +36 — 44.7% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -0.29 2016 1668 133.2 +4.47 -2.01 1.064 51.3% 0 +4 — 52.2% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.7 -0.80
28 2026 1708 124.4 +0.10 +2.08 1.042 51.0% — +59 — 70.6% +0.94 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2017 1893 143.8 +5.08 -0.79 1.134 52.4% +26 -228 -276 66.4% +0.92 12–7 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1872 146.7 +6.30 -1.90 1.092 51.6% +1 -125 -90 62.3% +0.73 16–8 (67%) 14–7 (67%) 107.5 -0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1802 139.1 +4.10 -1.39 1.079 51.4% +14 -176 +70 56.9% +0.57 10–6 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 95.7 +0.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1764 128.3 +1.47 -1.09 1.038 50.8% +27 -153 — 50.0% +0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.07
Career — 1883 134.4 +0.29 +0.25 0.986 49.7% +5 +91 -158 49.2% -0.12 24–35 (41%) 23–29 (44%) 92.9 -0.64 — 1945 141.6 +3.70 -1.05 1.060 51.2% +1 -18 -76 54.8% +0.37 95–87 (52%) 68–83 (45%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.