H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2020 Auckland fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2020* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jil Teichmann | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |