H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jil Teichmann vs Mandy Minella

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jil Teichmann vs Mandy Minella.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jil Teichmann
Switzerland Age 29 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jil Teichmann #369 7-5 6-4 Mandy Minella #192 Match data May 13, 2016 Q1 Q Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jil Teichmann #175 #21 2,101 1,882 94 104 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jil Teichmann Mandy Minella
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 1–1 50.0% #209 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 1–3 25.0% #139 1,523 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0
20 2018 3–6 33.3% #148 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2019 12–10 54.5% #69 1,609 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2020 9–12 42.9% #57 1,671 0 2 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0
23 2021 23–20 53.5% #37 1,777 0 2 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0
24 2022 19–21 47.5% #35 1,694 0 2 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0
25 2023 9–18 33.3% #147 1,625 0 2 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0
26 2024 3–2 60.0% #135 1,617 0 2 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0
27 2025 8–9 47.1% #123 1,648 0 2 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0
28 2026 6–2 75.0% #175 1,708 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jil Teichmann Mandy Minella
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 0 7 7 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2021 20 13 33 60.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2022 8 14 22 36.4% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2024 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2025 3 3 6 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2026 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 50 61 111 45.0% 43 34 77 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's and 144/156 of Mandy Minella's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jil Teichmann Mandy Minella
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 3.5 6.5 44.3% 70.9% 50.5% 63.5% 54.2% 59.3% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 4/4 2.0 5.0 53.5% 55.0% 40.6% 31.7% 45.4% 47.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 9/9 3.1 2.9 62.4% 69.7% 44.8% 55.3% 38.8% 60.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 22/22 1.9 1.6 63.6% 64.4% 50.3% 57.3% 52.8% 59.2% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 20/21 2.7 2.9 62.6% 64.0% 49.0% 60.6% 49.2% 58.2% 45.6% 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2%
23 2021 40/43 2.2 3.5 59.1% 63.8% 48.7% 56.1% 45.2% 57.5% 43.2% 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7%
24 2022 40/40 2.3 3.7 60.3% 63.7% 45.7% 52.8% 49.0% 56.3% 42.6% 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4%
25 2023 27/27 2.4 3.5 59.7% 61.7% 43.4% 48.4% 44.7% 54.6% 41.2% 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1%
26 2024 4/5 0.5 2.8 64.1% 60.7% 40.1% 31.7% 51.0% 52.6% 50.8% 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9%
27 2025 8/17 1.3 3.0 63.6% 58.2% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 50.2% 35.5% 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2%
28 2026 8/8 0.6 3.4 67.7% 58.6% 50.2% 52.7% 47.9% 56.0% 45.9% 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6%
Career — 184/198 2.2 3.2 60.9% 63.2% 46.4% 52.8% 46.6% 56.5% 42.9% — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jil Teichmann Mandy Minella
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1524 100.0 +0.12 +0.08 1.022 50.4% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1523 105.8 -2.24 -1.97 0.664 41.0% — — — 22.2% -2.55 1–0 — — -0.23 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08
20 2018 1533 114.7 +2.45 -2.19 1.002 49.7% +16 — — 40.0% -0.15 0–2 0–4 (0%) — -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 1610 121.1 +1.59 +1.12 1.104 52.0% -95 +168 — 53.1% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1672 133.5 +0.65 +1.84 1.092 51.6% -40 +83 — 51.1% +0.29 0–5 (0%) 1–1 — -0.20 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25
23 2021 1777 147.8 +1.29 +1.02 1.017 50.5% +25 -71 — 54.4% +0.13 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.0 -0.26 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07
24 2022 1694 140.7 -0.18 +0.52 0.976 49.5% -3 +179 -208 49.4% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 6–10 (38%) 95.6 -0.06 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16
25 2023 1626 126.4 -0.88 -1.70 0.908 48.0% +59 +76 -120 40.9% -0.68 3–9 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 90.9 +0.06 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53
26 2024 1617 107.3 -1.72 +1.68 1.072 51.5% -24 — — 55.6% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92
27 2025 1648 117.6 -2.75 -3.33 0.712 42.6% +30 +36 — 44.7% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -0.29 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65
28 2026 1708 124.4 +0.10 +2.08 1.042 51.0% — +59 — 70.6% +0.94 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.30 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 134.4 +0.29 +0.25 0.986 49.7% +5 +91 -158 49.2% -0.12 24–35 (41%) 23–29 (44%) 92.9 -0.64 — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.