H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-1
Jil Teichmann and Maryna Zanevska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2023 Strasbourg third round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2021* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maryna Zanevska | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jil Teichmann | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |