H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 0-1
Tereza Martincova holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tereza Martincova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tereza Martincova won the 2022 Ostrava third round 7-6(1) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2022* | Ostrava | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 7-6(1) 7-6(5) | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2020 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 7-5 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |