H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Johanna Konta vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 1-0
Johanna Konta holds a 1–0 lead over Richel Hogenkamp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Johanna Konta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johanna Konta won the 2013 Guangzhou third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-3 6-2 | Richel Hogenkamp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,579 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Johanna Konta | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |