H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 1-1
Julia Goerges and Garbiñe Muguruza are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2017 Rome fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 7-5 6-4 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2012* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |