H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Julia Goerges vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 2-0
Julia Goerges holds a 2–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 Rome second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2019* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-4 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2018* | Auckland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-1 6-4 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julia Goerges | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |