H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 0-1
Aleksandra Wozniak holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Wozniak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Wozniak won the 2009 Osaka fourth round 7-5 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2009* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 7-5 7-6(2) | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |