Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2010 Korea Open first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alisa Kleybanova | 6-2 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data | Sep 23, 2010* | R32 | Korea Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,877 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,780 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 22 | 16 | 38 | 57.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 25 | 16 | 41 | 61.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 77 | 61 | 138 | 55.8% | 21 | 22 | 43 | 48.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 184/197 of Alisa Kleybanova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1/2 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 44.1% | 73.1% | 33.3% | 44.4% | 25.0% | 50.8% | 42.0% |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | 2008 | 32/33 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 51.3% | 66.3% | 45.9% | 52.3% | 51.0% | 56.4% | 44.8% |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | 2009 | 53/55 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 57.0% | 64.0% | 48.4% | 53.8% | 49.8% | 57.1% | 44.6% |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | 2010 | 50/55 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 57.2% | 66.1% | 48.1% | 56.6% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.4% |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | 2011 | 25/26 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 55.8% | 66.2% | 45.5% | 53.6% | 54.0% | 56.9% | 46.2% |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | 2012 | 2/2 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 49.5% | 66.1% | 44.4% | 68.8% | 40.2% | 55.1% | 37.5% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7/8 | 5.6 | 4.1 | 50.8% | 63.2% | 35.4% | 51.3% | 42.8% | 49.6% | 43.0% |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | 2014 | 14/16 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 58.1% | 64.7% | 40.3% | 64.2% | 53.9% | 54.8% | 42.8% |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 184/200 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 55.6% | 65.4% | 46.2% | 55.1% | 50.0% | 56.8% | 44.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1514 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.15 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1499 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1473 | 97.0 | -1.84 | -0.90 | 0.854 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.02 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.4 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +11 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | 2008 | 1647 | 137.2 | +0.59 | +0.97 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -43 | -112 | +90 | 50.0% | +0.24 | 7–3 (70%) | 0–3 (0%) | 103.5 | -0.20 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -48 | +36 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | 2009 | 1781 | 141.6 | +1.51 | +0.24 | 1.040 | 50.9% | -6 | -169 | -80 | 56.4% | +0.35 | 10–13 (43%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.3 | +2.38 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | 2010 | 1828 | 151.3 | +2.66 | +0.90 | 1.067 | 51.6% | +4 | -191 | -99 | 56.8% | +0.62 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–9 (40%) | 96.7 | -1.00 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.3 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +62 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 2011 | 1780 | 142.2 | +1.00 | +1.86 | 1.072 | 51.5% | +40 | -131 | — | 53.3% | +0.53 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.66 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 2012 | 1777 | 108.2 | -0.89 | -1.44 | 0.834 | 48.0% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1770 | 112.0 | -1.63 | +0.12 | 0.852 | 46.4% | +18 | — | — | 42.1% | -1.16 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.1 | -0.13 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1529 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2014 | 1772 | 126.6 | +0.26 | +0.71 | 0.947 | 49.3% | +40 | -113 | — | 50.0% | -0.23 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.87 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +36 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2017 | 1764 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -48 | +36 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 1878 | 145.8 | +1.33 | +0.77 | 1.030 | 50.7% | +3 | -147 | 0 | 53.0% | +0.27 | 35–28 (56%) | 16–23 (41%) | 99.6 | -0.40 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 3 | 4 | 7 | Apr 26, 2014 | H2H |
| Aravane Rezai | 5 | 2 | 7 | Nov 6, 2010 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 7, 2010 | H2H |
| Olga Govortsova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 28, 2011 | H2H |
| Flavia Pennetta | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 13, 2011 | H2H |