H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 0-1
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2010 Seoul third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2010* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-2 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |