Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Ana Ivanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | 6-3 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data | May 25, 2010* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,118 | 421 | 216 | 66.1% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 15 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,037 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,986 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,827 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,939 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,871 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 1,874 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,856 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,048 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #63 | 1,684 | 1 | 15 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 70.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 26 | 13 | 39 | 66.7% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 27 | 12 | 39 | 69.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 62.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 39 | 13 | 52 | 75.0% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 286 | 148 | 434 | 65.9% | 89 | 43 | 132 | 67.4% | 41 | 23 | 64 | 64.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 517/630 of Ana Ivanovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 12/46 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 55.7% | 67.6% | 52.9% | 52.0% | 42.8% | 60.8% | 46.7% |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | 2006 | 37/54 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 55.5% | 69.0% | 49.2% | 60.6% | 50.1% | 60.3% | 47.0% |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | 2007 | 62/66 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 57.2% | 71.1% | 49.0% | 53.4% | 51.4% | 61.6% | 46.6% |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | 2008 | 47/54 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 62.3% | 67.9% | 49.5% | 57.8% | 49.4% | 60.9% | 46.3% |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | 2009 | 32/36 | 3.2 | 4.6 | 60.8% | 65.9% | 49.8% | 59.1% | 53.4% | 59.2% | 45.1% |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | 2010 | 48/51 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 59.0% | 70.2% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 50.1% | 59.9% | 46.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 45/52 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 54.6% | 71.9% | 48.1% | 59.4% | 50.6% | 60.9% | 48.2% |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | 2012 | 47/54 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 55.8% | 69.3% | 47.9% | 51.3% | 48.8% | 59.9% | 46.2% |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | 2013 | 52/61 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 57.7% | 67.2% | 49.3% | 55.8% | 52.6% | 59.7% | 48.3% |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | 2014 | 71/77 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 60.6% | 67.9% | 49.8% | 57.6% | 51.0% | 60.8% | 48.4% |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 2015 | 35/48 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 62.1% | 68.3% | 47.4% | 54.4% | 46.4% | 60.3% | 44.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29/31 | 2.7 | 4.2 | 59.8% | 67.3% | 42.7% | 49.4% | 48.5% | 57.4% | 45.0% |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 517/637 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 58.5% | 68.8% | 48.2% | 55.3% | 50.2% | 60.3% | 46.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1543 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.12 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.3 | -0.54 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1850 | 150.3 | +3.23 | +2.55 | 1.191 | 52.9% | -43 | -122 | -247 | 65.7% | +0.96 | 8–3 (73%) | 8–1 (89%) | 112.3 | +0.56 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.4 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +11 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | 2006 | 1895 | 151.5 | +3.56 | +2.92 | 1.182 | 53.4% | -15 | -151 | -172 | 64.3% | +1.14 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.8 | -0.58 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -48 | +36 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | 2007 | 2038 | 159.0 | +5.55 | +4.04 | 1.216 | 54.1% | -62 | -22 | -172 | 65.5% | +1.17 | 15–3 (83%) | 5–2 (71%) | 112.5 | -2.51 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | 2008 | 1987 | 164.1 | +5.49 | +3.02 | 1.186 | 53.6% | -11 | +74 | -137 | 67.2% | +1.20 | 12–10 (55%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.5 | -1.28 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.3 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +62 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 2009 | 1828 | 136.0 | +3.01 | +1.86 | 1.108 | 52.3% | -1 | +191 | +29 | 60.0% | +0.80 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.3 | +1.32 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 2010 | 1940 | 156.0 | +3.95 | +2.72 | 1.147 | 52.9% | +4 | +25 | -134 | 64.2% | +1.10 | 5–4 (56%) | 9–5 (64%) | 102.7 | -2.94 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1872 | 151.9 | +4.17 | +3.67 | 1.234 | 54.3% | +36 | -19 | -25 | 62.9% | +1.43 | 1–8 (11%) | 3–10 (23%) | 83.3 | +1.25 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1529 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2012 | 1875 | 149.9 | +3.85 | +3.01 | 1.152 | 52.8% | +9 | +6 | +7 | 63.4% | +0.95 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.2 | -0.65 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | 2013 | 1856 | 156.8 | +3.94 | +4.03 | 1.197 | 54.0% | +6 | +62 | -26 | 61.7% | +1.14 | 8–13 (38%) | 5–8 (38%) | 91.3 | -0.64 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +36 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2014 | 2048 | 165.8 | +4.88 | +5.41 | 1.235 | 54.6% | -22 | -45 | -121 | 73.1% | +1.51 | 13–8 (62%) | 12–3 (80%) | 108.8 | -3.79 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2015 | 1855 | 147.0 | +1.43 | +3.09 | 1.121 | 52.3% | +30 | +80 | -4 | 59.5% | +0.82 | 7–12 (37%) | 6–7 (46%) | 89.9 | +1.19 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1684 | 127.0 | +0.89 | +1.59 | 1.057 | 51.3% | +67 | +187 | +113 | 50.0% | +0.20 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–3 (57%) | 94.0 | +1.36 |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -48 | +36 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 2119 | 159.9 | +3.97 | +3.43 | 1.177 | 53.5% | -3 | +13 | -76 | 63.8% | +1.08 | 92–82 (53%) | 73–62 (54%) | 97.3 | -1.15 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | 4 | 10 | 14 | Jan 10, 2015 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 9 | 5 | 14 | Apr 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 4 | 9 | 13 | Oct 7, 2015 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 10 | 3 | 13 | Apr 26, 2014 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 11 | 1 | 12 | Oct 8, 2015 | H2H |