H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Kai-Chen Chang vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2009 Korea Open second round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.

Chinese Taipei Age 35 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #77 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Kai-Chen Chang #140 Match data Sep 25, 2009* R16 Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kai-Chen Chang — #82 808 1,646 32 59 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld — #14 1,365 1,856 109 131 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Anna-Lena Groenefeld
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 5–5 50.0% #94 1,558 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0
19 2010 9–15 37.5% #117 1,565 0 0 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0
20 2011 1–8 11.1% #148 1,489 0 0 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0
21 2012 9–11 45.0% #86 1,579 0 0 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1
22 2013 1–4 20.0% #621 1,532 0 0 2007 4–15 21.1% #204 1,521 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,593 0 1
24 2015 1–2 33.3% #134 1,529 0 0 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #131 1,602 0 0 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1
26 2017 2–9 18.2% #219 1,536 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1
27 2018 1–1 50.0% #401 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2012 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2013 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2017 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — 58 77 135 43.0% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 140/231 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 9/10 1.0 4.1 64.7% 59.0% 43.6% 58.2% 54.3% 53.4% 47.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 22/24 1.6 6.8 58.9% 58.6% 41.8% 54.0% 46.2% 51.7% 44.6% 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0%
20 2011 9/9 1.7 4.6 63.3% 61.6% 39.8% 49.4% 42.5% 53.4% 40.5% 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3%
21 2012 18/20 1.8 5.3 59.7% 62.2% 41.6% 43.4% 47.6% 54.1% 43.1% 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9%
22 2013 4/5 0.5 7.3 58.3% 63.2% 38.3% 61.1% 54.1% 52.8% 44.6% 2007 16/19 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4%
24 2015 2/3 2.0 3.0 62.9% 55.7% 48.8% 62.9% 52.6% 53.0% 47.3% 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2%
25 2016 7/7 1.6 7.1 57.2% 62.9% 41.9% 56.2% 48.6% 54.3% 47.2% 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9%
26 2017 11/11 2.0 7.5 57.6% 55.9% 34.9% 51.1% 38.8% 46.9% 39.9% 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9%
27 2018 2/2 1.0 5.5 63.9% 60.4% 38.2% 56.7% 60.0% 52.2% 50.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84/91 1.6 6.0 60.0% 59.9% 40.8% 52.1% 47.1% 52.3% 44.0% — 140/240 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.2% 57.1% 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Anna-Lena Groenefeld
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2009 1558 119.5 -1.06 +1.66 1.024 50.6% +10 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.20 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25
19 2010 1565 115.7 -2.81 +0.01 0.923 48.1% +27 -47 +37 41.1% -0.68 3–7 (30%) 1–0 — -0.25 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25
20 2011 1489 107.6 -1.48 -2.00 0.870 47.1% +59 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.22 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73
21 2012 1579 117.4 -2.25 -0.69 0.939 48.7% +63 — — 44.2% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -0.04 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20
22 2013 1532 98.7 -1.81 -0.42 0.946 49.0% +42 — — 25.0% -1.17 1–1 0–2 — +0.21 2007 1522 109.9 -1.54 -3.57 0.830 46.3% 0 +226 — 26.2% -1.21 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 93.7 +0.52
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1594 128.7 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -23 +139 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.00
24 2015 1530 107.9 -0.55 -0.03 1.007 50.3% +35 — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — -0.01 2009 1655 129.0 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -60 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.9 -1.97
25 2016 1603 113.2 -1.35 +0.69 1.031 50.7% +29 — — 41.2% +0.18 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28 2010 1563 104.7 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% -2 +101 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12
26 2017 1537 106.9 -5.20 -1.20 0.751 43.4% +37 — — 17.4% -2.39 1–0 1–1 — -0.21 2011 1543 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26
27 2018 1536 102.0 -0.12 -0.26 1.065 51.5% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 117.6 -2.39 -0.31 0.921 48.2% +38 -47 +37 37.7% -0.76 11–18 (38%) 9–8 (53%) 98.4 +0.74 — 1857 131.6 +0.84 -1.46 0.971 49.4% -24 +89 -197 47.1% -0.20 27–38 (42%) 18–26 (41%) 91.9 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.