H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 0-1
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic won the 2011 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | 7-5 6-1 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |