H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 0-2
Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2010 US Open second round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-0 6-0 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-4 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |