H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kai-Chen Chang vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 0-2

Caroline Wozniacki holds a 2–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Wozniacki won the 2010 US Open second round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kai-Chen Chang
Chinese Taipei Age 35 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Caroline Wozniacki
Denmark Age 36 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Wozniacki #2 6-0 6-0 Kai-Chen Chang #84 Match data Sep 2, 2010* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #4 6-4 6-3 Kai-Chen Chang #89 Match data Jun 24, 2010* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kai-Chen Chang #1,233 #82 808 1,646 32 59 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Caroline Wozniacki #289 #1 10,255 2,154 620 275 69.3% 1 6 1 11 11 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Caroline Wozniacki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 4–4 50.0% #231 1,527 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2007 12–15 44.4% #60 1,555 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 53–20 72.6% #12 1,913 0 3
18 2009 5–5 50.0% #94 1,558 0 0 2009 66–25 72.5% #4 1,898 0 6
19 2010 9–15 37.5% #117 1,565 0 0 2010 63–17 78.8% #1 2,105 0 12
20 2011 1–8 11.1% #148 1,488 0 0 2011 63–17 78.8% #1 1,988 0 18
21 2012 9–11 45.0% #86 1,579 0 0 2012 50–21 70.4% #10 1,975 0 20
22 2013 1–4 20.0% #621 1,531 0 0 2013 41–22 65.1% #10 1,906 0 21
23 — — — — — — — 2014 49–19 72.1% #8 2,014 0 22
24 2015 1–2 33.3% #134 1,529 0 0 2015 39–23 62.9% #17 1,817 0 23
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #131 1,602 0 0 2016 34–18 65.4% #19 1,912 0 25
26 2017 2–9 18.2% #219 1,536 0 0 2017 60–22 73.2% #3 2,004 0 27
27 2018 1–1 50.0% #401 1,536 0 0 2018 41–17 70.7% #3 1,947 1 30
28 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #38 1,845 1 30
29 — — — — — — — 2020 5–2 71.4% #36 1,852 1 30
32 — — — — — — — 2023 4–3 57.1% #249 1,862 1 30
33 — — — — — — — 2024 16–13 55.2% #70 1,845 1 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Caroline Wozniacki
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 42 13 55 76.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
18 2009 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 35 18 53 66.0% 23 6 29 79.3% 8 1 9 88.9%
19 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 45 9 54 83.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2011 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 40 11 51 78.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2012 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 42 14 56 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2013 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 34 14 48 70.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 42 15 57 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2015 26 17 43 60.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0%
25 2016 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2016 31 14 45 68.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 2017 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 41 14 55 74.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
27 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 26 12 38 68.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 1 7 85.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 12 9 21 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
Career — 30 45 75 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% — 447 188 635 70.4% 111 59 170 65.3% 62 28 90 68.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Caroline Wozniacki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/8 2.7 2.3 65.7% 58.9% 51.0% 43.9% 42.3% 56.6% 49.3%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 18/27 1.1 3.2 67.3% 56.6% 40.0% 54.4% 45.4% 51.4% 41.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 63/73 2.1 2.1 65.9% 65.6% 50.8% 58.8% 54.4% 60.4% 49.1%
18 2009 9/10 1.0 4.1 64.7% 59.0% 43.6% 58.2% 54.3% 53.4% 47.7% 2009 86/91 2.0 1.7 68.9% 64.2% 50.0% 52.2% 49.6% 59.7% 48.6%
19 2010 22/24 1.6 6.8 58.9% 58.6% 41.8% 54.0% 46.2% 51.7% 44.6% 2010 71/80 1.8 1.9 68.9% 65.3% 50.2% 59.5% 50.1% 60.6% 48.1%
20 2011 9/9 1.7 4.6 63.3% 61.6% 39.8% 49.4% 42.5% 53.4% 40.5% 2011 73/80 1.6 1.6 70.6% 65.6% 51.4% 58.1% 53.0% 61.5% 51.1%
21 2012 18/20 1.8 5.3 59.7% 62.2% 41.6% 43.4% 47.6% 54.1% 43.1% 2012 60/71 1.8 1.6 66.8% 63.6% 51.4% 59.5% 52.9% 59.4% 47.5%
22 2013 4/5 0.5 7.3 58.3% 63.2% 38.3% 61.1% 54.1% 52.8% 44.6% 2013 56/63 1.5 1.8 69.1% 62.5% 50.3% 59.3% 54.1% 58.9% 47.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 61/68 2.3 2.6 69.6% 66.0% 48.0% 58.7% 53.3% 60.4% 48.1%
24 2015 2/3 2.0 3.0 62.9% 55.7% 48.8% 62.9% 52.6% 53.0% 47.3% 2015 51/62 2.0 1.9 69.9% 65.3% 52.6% 50.4% 51.3% 61.5% 46.7%
25 2016 7/7 1.6 7.1 57.2% 62.9% 41.9% 56.2% 48.6% 54.3% 47.2% 2016 44/52 2.1 2.1 67.7% 66.5% 46.3% 57.0% 56.3% 59.9% 47.8%
26 2017 11/11 2.0 7.5 57.6% 55.9% 34.9% 51.1% 38.8% 46.9% 39.9% 2017 76/82 2.6 2.2 67.6% 65.7% 49.4% 56.8% 51.6% 60.2% 47.8%
27 2018 2/2 1.0 5.5 63.9% 60.4% 38.2% 56.7% 60.0% 52.2% 50.9% 2018 50/58 3.0 2.5 64.9% 68.0% 48.4% 52.5% 54.9% 61.2% 48.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 2.8 1.8 65.3% 63.2% 50.1% 51.6% 50.7% 58.5% 44.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 3.1 1.3 70.4% 68.7% 54.5% 63.1% 43.8% 64.8% 49.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 7/7 2.1 3.0 61.5% 67.5% 47.4% 57.7% 36.6% 59.6% 44.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 27/29 1.8 2.6 64.3% 65.3% 47.6% 55.5% 55.0% 59.1% 46.8%
Career — 84/91 1.6 6.0 60.0% 59.9% 40.8% 52.1% 47.1% 52.3% 44.0% — 788/895 2.1 2.0 67.9% 65.0% 49.7% 56.4% 52.2% 60.0% 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kai-Chen Chang Caroline Wozniacki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1482 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — -0.25
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1527 119.1 +0.53 +0.91 1.137 52.5% +17 — — 47.1% -0.12 1–0 — — -0.46
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1556 117.2 -2.81 -1.82 0.860 46.7% +15 -35 — 46.0% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 103.2 +0.40
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1914 154.8 +4.79 +4.70 1.241 54.7% -5 -303 -228 69.9% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 6–8 (43%) 104.7 -0.96
18 2009 1558 119.4 -1.06 +1.66 1.024 50.6% +11 — — 50.0% +0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.20 2009 1899 153.9 +3.97 +4.82 1.208 54.1% -27 -24 -64 69.4% +1.47 15–8 (65%) 11–7 (61%) 106.6 -0.77
19 2010 1565 115.7 -2.81 +0.01 0.923 48.1% +27 -48 +36 41.1% -0.68 3–7 (30%) 1–0 — -0.25 2010 2105 166.0 +4.94 +4.76 1.219 54.3% +27 -204 -284 72.4% +1.70 18–4 (82%) 8–2 (80%) 113.4 +1.46
20 2011 1489 107.6 -1.48 -2.00 0.870 47.1% +59 — — 27.3% -1.55 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.22 2011 1988 162.1 +5.76 +7.01 1.328 56.0% +52 -9 -153 74.7% +1.90 11–7 (61%) 10–5 (67%) 101.2 +1.97
21 2012 1579 117.3 -2.25 -0.69 0.939 48.7% +62 — — 44.2% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 -0.04 2012 1976 156.2 +3.80 +4.12 1.171 53.6% +42 -42 -144 66.9% +1.29 15–9 (63%) 11–8 (58%) 100.8 +0.75
22 2013 1532 98.7 -1.81 -0.42 0.946 49.0% +42 — — 25.0% -1.17 1–1 0–2 — +0.21 2013 1906 152.3 +3.39 +3.53 1.156 53.3% +82 -137 -61 61.0% +1.06 9–9 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 92.0 +3.21
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2014 163.0 +4.24 +5.25 1.216 54.2% +24 -280 -133 64.9% +1.45 16–6 (73%) 5–10 (33%) 100.3 -0.30
24 2015 1529 107.9 -0.55 -0.03 1.007 50.3% +36 — — 33.3% -0.33 — — — -0.01 2015 1818 153.2 +3.21 +4.72 1.211 54.0% +6 -9 +74 62.6% +1.23 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.2 -0.90
25 2016 1603 113.2 -1.35 +0.69 1.031 50.7% +29 — — 41.2% +0.18 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28 2016 1912 146.8 +3.41 +3.91 1.191 53.8% +27 — -117 65.2% +1.25 8–7 (53%) 3–5 (38%) 96.7 -0.32
26 2017 1537 106.9 -5.20 -1.20 0.751 43.4% +36 — — 17.4% -2.39 1–0 1–1 — -0.21 2017 2004 161.0 +3.91 +4.92 1.202 54.0% +52 -146 -103 68.5% +1.56 17–8 (68%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 +0.13
27 2018 1536 102.0 -0.12 -0.26 1.065 51.5% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.27 2018 1947 156.8 +4.39 +5.24 1.245 54.7% +6 -64 +24 67.7% +1.47 12–6 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 101.2 +0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1845 144.8 +1.89 +0.99 1.069 51.3% +47 -6 +118 60.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 96.0 +0.87
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1853 131.5 +2.36 +2.51 1.397 56.9% +35 — — 70.6% +1.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1863 134.9 +2.02 +2.05 1.110 51.8% +58 — — 56.3% +0.56 1–1 1–0 — -0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1845 140.8 +1.93 +2.73 1.145 53.0% +44 -42 +224 58.1% +0.77 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.15
Career — 1646 117.6 -2.39 -0.31 0.921 48.2% +38 -48 +36 37.7% -0.76 11–18 (38%) 9–8 (53%) 98.4 +0.74 — 2154 160.9 +3.83 +4.42 1.199 53.9% +28 -90 -57 66.3% +1.33 153–96 (61%) 94–79 (54%) 104.3 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.