H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 1-0
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2012 Pattaya third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2012* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 7-5 6-1 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |