Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 2, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Madison Brengle
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Kai-Chen Chang vs Madison Brengle.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Madison Brengle | Match data | Sep 22, 2017 | Q1 | Wuhan Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | — | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Madison Brengle | #178 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,722 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #73 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2011 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | 65 | 103 | 168 | 38.7% | 17 | 31 | 48 | 35.4% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 60.2% | 57.4% | 40.8% | 48.9% | 50.7% | 50.5% | 41.0% |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | 2008 | 2/3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 66.3% | 49.4% | 35.3% | 12.5% | 63.6% | 45.2% | 37.3% |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | 2009 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 61.8% | 56.2% | 38.6% | 41.1% | 37.6% | 49.3% | 43.5% |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | 2010 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 53.7% | 44.4% | 38.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 41.8% | 47.2% |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | 2011 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 56.3% | 44.7% | 38.9% | 40.0% | 52.0% | 35.6% |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | 2012 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 65.2% | 61.3% | 35.0% | 30.0% | 83.3% | 52.2% | 41.7% |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | 2014 | 7/8 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 66.2% | 62.5% | 42.8% | 49.4% | 47.3% | 55.7% | 44.3% |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | 2015 | 35/51 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 66.0% | 61.5% | 48.8% | 42.8% | 46.6% | 57.2% | 41.3% |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | 2016 | 37/39 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 68.5% | 56.8% | 45.7% | 46.0% | 54.9% | 53.2% | 43.1% |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 2017 | 28/28 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 73.3% | 54.5% | 39.2% | 43.7% | 45.2% | 50.6% | 44.1% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 66.6% | 50.4% | 43.5% | 42.0% | 45.0% | 48.4% | 43.5% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18/18 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 73.8% | 51.9% | 37.5% | 39.8% | 54.6% | 48.3% | 47.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6/6 | 0.2 | 3.7 | 72.6% | 50.8% | 44.5% | 45.3% | 38.1% | 49.0% | 48.3% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20/20 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 74.5% | 55.6% | 39.8% | 42.5% | 48.0% | 51.4% | 44.1% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27/28 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 73.1% | 55.8% | 39.7% | 41.5% | 47.1% | 51.3% | 44.0% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20/20 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 75.1% | 54.6% | 41.7% | 40.9% | 51.5% | 51.4% | 43.0% |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 225/246 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 70.3% | 55.9% | 42.5% | 42.8% | 49.1% | 52.0% | 43.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1502 | 110.8 | 0.00 | +0.02 | 0.829 | 46.5% | +15 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | — | — | -0.27 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.5 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | 2008 | 1457 | 92.1 | -3.04 | -1.39 | 0.681 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.43 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -47 | +37 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | 2009 | 1456 | 101.5 | -2.95 | -0.91 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.07 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | 2010 | 1447 | 99.2 | -3.58 | -2.65 | 0.810 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.4 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +63 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 2011 | 1459 | 101.5 | -2.09 | -1.94 | 0.741 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 2012 | 1444 | 99.4 | -2.21 | +0.67 | 0.871 | 47.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1530 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +35 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2014 | 1474 | 113.6 | -0.29 | +1.12 | 1.002 | 50.0% | +30 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.64 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | 2015 | 1622 | 128.9 | -0.60 | -0.18 | 0.964 | 49.3% | +5 | -83 | — | 48.7% | -0.07 | 7–8 (47%) | 6–6 (50%) | 100.8 | +0.20 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +37 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2016 | 1592 | 127.1 | -1.99 | +0.54 | 0.921 | 48.3% | +5 | -74 | +30 | 42.4% | -0.75 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.3 | -1.69 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2017 | 1654 | 130.5 | -4.01 | +1.14 | 0.892 | 47.3% | -26 | -55 | -1 | 38.2% | -0.78 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.1 | -1.75 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1605 | 118.6 | -4.52 | +0.81 | 0.843 | 45.8% | -20 | -29 | — | 33.3% | -1.36 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | -1.35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1601 | 115.2 | -5.23 | +2.99 | 0.913 | 47.8% | -45 | -25 | — | 42.1% | -0.68 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.28 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1644 | 121.9 | -2.92 | +1.95 | 0.947 | 48.8% | -1 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.07 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | -0.11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1645 | 119.5 | -3.17 | +0.46 | 0.907 | 47.7% | +15 | -91 | +15 | 34.8% | -1.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1631 | 135.0 | -3.81 | +1.21 | 0.902 | 47.6% | +61 | -46 | -100 | 42.6% | -0.72 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.1 | -0.90 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1583 | 118.6 | -4.39 | -0.51 | 0.886 | 47.1% | +13 | +7 | -81 | 34.9% | -1.26 | 0–5 (0%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.1 | -0.79 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1571 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1521 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -47 | +37 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 1723 | 129.4 | -2.95 | +0.67 | 0.906 | 47.8% | +6 | -59 | -13 | 40.6% | -0.76 | 27–45 (38%) | 25–22 (53%) | 98.9 | -2.76 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Madison Brengle
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2023 | H2H |
| Kateryna Baindl | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2020 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 8, 2019 | H2H |